Navigating Social Media in The Age of Online Controversy

There’s just not much room for error on social media these days. All it takes is a few individuals to find something wrong with a brand’s message. Within minutes, word can spread like wildfire and everyone logged into any of the major social media sites will have been exposed to and can often add to the backlash. 

Social Media Backlash Through The Years

There’s no denying that the rules of social media changed in the wake of the 2016 presidential election. In 2017, Adweek published an article titled “Branding Social Etiquette in the Age of Trump” that discusses how social media etiquette changed with Trump in office. “Under a Donald Trump presidency, political conversations are trending on Twitter,” writes Jenny Wolfram. She mentions that even when businesses want no part of it, they are coerced into discussion on politics by consumers as the public looks to companies and brands to pick sides. As Wolfram puts it, “One wrong step can lead to a mass consumer boycott or a plummeting stock value.”

Her insight holds true today. From the 2017 “Live Bolder” Pepsi campaign that showed Kendall Jenner ending a political protest by offering a Pepsi as a token of peace to police officers to the Bud Light controversy of 2023, we’ve seen that as much as social media changes, it’s revelry in a brand’s tone-deaf mistakes stays constant. 

How to Handle Online Backlash

The bad news is that there’s no surefire way for a company to prevent criticism from the public, no matter what political or socially relevant or responsible messages they choose to make. So how, in a world in which consumers want brands to take a stand for political and social issues, can an organization protect itself against becoming kindle for internet outrage?  

There are ways to prevent a complete brand meltdown when criticism occurs, and a good crisis team can lead you through it.

In the case of Pepsi, apologizing quickly and getting back to business worked, since the company has a pre-established respected, recognizable brand. Bud Light on the other hand, fumbled its apology, refusing to stand behind the influencer it hired, neither winning back the customers it lost by working with a Trans influencer nor gaining new fans by proudly standing for Trans rights. Bud Light’s failure to quickly and decisively take ownership of its decision led to a drawn-out online outcry from both left- and right-leaning accounts. 

How to Spurn Conversation Rather Than Cancellation 

But the most effective tool for any company when wading into online activism is actually creating a campaign that opens up dialogue and reflects political conversations in a nuanced and informed way. This means avoiding pitfalls by bringing the right people to the table and “screen-testing” social messaging and online political campaigns with a diverse group – or better yet, creating diverse teams to work on them. Brands can certainly be both effective and retain their customer base when wading into political issues. 

Between offering crisis management, communications and public relations strategies, TASC can help your organization navigate how to best handle controversy online. Explore our comprehensive range of PR and Communications services to discover how we can assist in brand management. 

Daily Harvest’s Failed Response And What Crisis Professionals Can Learn From It

Just as social media built the company’s reputation, it also destroyed it. Daily Harvest knew how to use social media and influencers to market its products, but failed to use the outlets for crisis management.  

Daily Harvest is a meal delivery service that specializes in healthy plant-based food. The company focuses on convenience. Made for the busy person, Daily Harvest meals are either ready to eat or require minimal preparation. Grain bowls, soups and smoothies aim to make clean eating more accessible. 

TikTok influencer Abby Silverman received a PR package from Daily Harvest in May that contained French lentil and leek crumbles. After consuming them, she reported severe stomach pain, leading to two visits to the ER. She posted a two minute Tik Tok video about her experience that went viral with more than 1 million views and almost 4,000 comments. This post was a catalyst of conversation which forced Daily Harvest to take action. 

In June of 2022, Daily Harvest voluntarily recalled their French lentil and leek crumbles. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the meals caused sickness in 500 people and sent 113 people to the hospital. Those who consumed the crumbles claimed to experience symptoms such as stomach pain, liver problems, jaundice, dark urine, fatigue, fever, vomiting, diarrhea, nausea, back pain and shoulder pain. A lawyer representing a number of victims reported that over 25 of his clients had to get their gallbladders removed. 

Daily Harvest claims they took immediate and proper action in a statement published on their website. The company explained that as soon as they received reports of the contaminated French lentil and leek crumbles they motioned a recall. Customers who received the product were notified and an investigation was launched with the FDA. 

Considering that Daily Harvest acquired most of their business on social media, they should have also used it as a platform to spread information on the French lentil and leek crumbles recall. Daily Harvest failed when it came to keeping their customers informed and victims found themselves looking to Reddit forums for answers and guidance. 

Their first Instagram post on the issue aimed to advertise a different product while leading people to a link in their bio for concerns on the French lentil and leek crumbles recall. Burying information while customers’ health was at risk was unprofessional and inappropriate. Daily Harvest had an obligation to keep their customers informed and failed to take the situation seriously enough.

From a PR standpoint, there are numerous ways this crisis could have been handled better. Daily Harvest was slow to report to their customers on the facts they needed. They neglected to post on social media, portraying a lack of accountability. Customers lost trust in the company based on their response to the issue. A crisis on any scale can sometimes be unavoidable, yet what the company can control is an appropriate PR response that can mend the relationship between consumer and business. 

 

Back to top